Free tool
Every language difficulty chart assumes you speak English. This one doesn't. Pick your native language and we'll re-rank all 48 languages by how hard each is likely to be for you, combining official FSI study hours with language family and writing system. Then start the easy way: by reading real books.
Ranked easiest โ hardest for English speakers. FSI hours are measured for English speakers; the โfor youโ estimate adjusts them from shared family and script and is approximate.
The easiest language to learn depends on your native one: for English speakers the U.S. Foreign Service Institute rates French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese and Dutch among the fastest, at about 750 hours to professional working proficiency. This free tool ranks 48 languages from easiest to hardest and re-ranks them for your own native language, weighing FSI study hours against shared family and writing system.
| # | Language | Est. hours for you | FSI difficulty (English) | Family | Script |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Dutch | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Germanic | Latin |
| 2 | ๐ธ๐ช Swedish | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Germanic | Latin |
| 3 | ๐ณ๐ด Norwegian | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Germanic | Latin |
| 4 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Danish | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Germanic | Latin |
| 5 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Afrikaans | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Germanic | Latin |
| 6 | ๐ซ๐ท French | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 7 | ๐ช๐ธ Spanish | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 8 | ๐ฎ๐น Italian | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 9 | ๐ต๐น Portuguese | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 10 | ๐ท๐ด Romanian | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 11 | ๐ด๓ ฅ๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ Catalan | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 12 | ๐ช๐ธ Galician | 750 h | Easiest (Cat. I) | Romance | Latin |
| 13 | ๐ฉ๐ช German | 900 h | Easy (Cat. II) | Germanic | Latin |
| 14 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesian | 900 h | Easy (Cat. II) | Malayo-Polynesian | Latin |
| 15 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malay | 900 h | Easy (Cat. II) | Malayo-Polynesian | Latin |
| 16 | ๐ฐ๐ช Swahili | 900 h | Easy (Cat. II) | Bantu | Latin |
| 17 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Icelandic | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Germanic | Latin |
| 18 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic, Latin |
| 19 | ๐ต๐ฑ Polish | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 20 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czech | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 21 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovak | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 22 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 23 | ๐ง๐ฆ Bosnian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 24 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Latin |
| 25 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Baltic | Latin |
| 26 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuanian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Baltic | Latin |
| 27 | ๐ฆ๐ฑ Albanian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Albanian | Latin |
| 28 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finnish | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Finno-Ugric | Latin |
| 29 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungarian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Finno-Ugric | Latin |
| 30 | ๐ช๐ช Estonian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Finno-Ugric | Latin |
| 31 | ๐น๐ท Turkish | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Turkic | Latin |
| 32 | ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijani | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Turkic | Latin |
| 33 | ๐ป๐ณ Vietnamese | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Vietic | Latin |
| 34 | ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakh | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Turkic | Cyrillic, Latin |
| 35 | ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbek | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Turkic | Latin |
| 36 | ๐ต๐ญ Filipino | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Malayo-Polynesian | Latin |
| 37 | ๐ด Basque | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Isolate | Latin |
| 38 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ Zulu | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Bantu | Latin |
| 39 | ๐ท๐บ Russian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic |
| 40 | ๐บ๐ฆ Ukrainian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic |
| 41 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgarian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic |
| 42 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ Macedonian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic |
| 43 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greek | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Hellenic | Greek |
| 44 | ๐ฆ๐ฒ Armenian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Armenian | Armenian |
| 45 | ๐ง๐พ Belarusian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Slavic | Cyrillic |
| 46 | ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Mongolic | Cyrillic |
| 47 | ๐ฌ๐ช Georgian | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Kartvelian | Georgian (Mkhedruli) |
| 48 | ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyz | 1100 h | Hard (Cat. III) | Turkic | Cyrillic |
Study hours a native English speaker needs for professional working proficiency, by FSI category. Each language links to its own timeline by CEFR level.
| FSI category | Hours | Languages |
|---|---|---|
| Easiest (Cat. I) | 750 h | French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Romanian, Afrikaans, Catalan, Galician |
| Easy (Cat. II) | 900 h | German, Indonesian, Malay, Swahili |
| Hard (Cat. III) | 1,100 h | Russian, Serbian, Ukrainian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Croatian, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Slovenian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Finnish, Hungarian, Estonian, Turkish, Azerbaijani, Greek, Vietnamese, Icelandic, Kazakh, Uzbek, Filipino, Mongolian, Georgian, Armenian, Albanian, Basque, Zulu, Belarusian, Kyrgyz |
FSI Category IV (about 2,200 hours: Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean) is not in Lingo7 yet, so it is not ranked here.
Many languages share one FSI figure, so a tie goes by distance from English: a language in the Germanic branch with the Latin script sits closest, a language from another family with another script sits furthest.
For English speakers the rank is the FSI study-hour estimate itself: the classroom hours the U.S. Foreign Service Institute found a native English speaker needs for professional working proficiency, from 750 to 1,100 hours among these 48 languages. Pick another native language and each figure is scaled by a closeness factor built from three inputs: the sub-family branch (Romance, Germanic, Slavic, Turkic and so on), the language family and the writing system. The factor is 0.55 for the same branch and script, 0.7 for the same branch in another script, 0.85 for the same family and script, 0.95 for a shared script alone, 1.05 for the same family in another script and 1.2 for neither. The FSI hours are multiplied by your factor divided by the English speaker's factor for that language, then rounded to the nearest 25 hours, with a floor of 300; a tie goes to the language closer to yours. The FSI only measured English speakers, so the adjusted figure is an estimate, not an official number.
Whatever you pick, the fastest route through those hours is reading: seeing words in real sentences, again and again, until they stick. That's exactly what Lingo7 is built for.
Picked one? See how long it takes to learn it →
Already learning one? Test your level (CEFR A1-C2) →
The easiest are the 12 FSI Category I languages, at about 750 hours each to professional working proficiency: French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Romanian, Afrikaans, Catalan and Galician. Of these, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish and Afrikaans belong to the Germanic branch, like English.
The hardest for English speakers are FSI Category IV (Arabic, Mandarin Chinese, Japanese, Korean), at about 2,200 hours. They are not in Lingo7 yet, so this ranking tops out at Category III: 32 languages at about 1,100 hours. Furthest from English among them, by family and script, are Kyrgyz, Georgian and Mongolian.
The U.S. Foreign Service Institute groups languages by the classroom hours a native English speaker needs to reach professional working proficiency. In this ranking: Category I, about 750 hours (12 languages, such as French and Spanish); Category II, about 900 hours (4 languages, such as German and Indonesian); Category III, about 1,100 hours (32 languages, such as Russian and Serbian). Category IV, about 2,200 hours, covers Arabic, Chinese, Japanese and Korean.
Yes, significantly. A language that shares your language family and writing system is far easier than the raw FSI figure suggests, Italian is much easier for a Spanish speaker than for an English speaker. This tool estimates that adjustment from shared family, sub-family branch and script; the FSI hours themselves are still measured for English speakers.
Extensive reading is one of the most efficient paths, because it builds vocabulary and grammatical intuition in context at scale. Lingo7 lets you read real books with parallel translation and native-narrated audio, so you absorb a language faster than with flashcards alone.